Inferior Vena Cava Filters - Retrieval Program
Paulo Eduardo Ocke Reis1,2*
1Department of Specialized and General Surgery, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2Vascular Clinic Ocke Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- *Corresponding Author:
- Paulo Eduardo Ocke Reis
Department of Specialized and General Surgery
Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tel: +55 21 2629-5000
E-mail: [email protected]
Received date: March 14, 2018; Accepted date: March 16, 2018; Published date: March 31, 2018
Citation: Reis PEO (2018) Inferior Vena Cava Filters - Retrieval Program. J Vasc Endovasc Therapy. 3:3. doi: 10.21767/2573-4482.100073
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of death, anticoagulation is the main treatment in prevention of PE and
for acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), an
absolute contraindication for pharmacotherapy makes necessary
an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) implantation. For over twenty
years permanent IVCF were used, but mainly from the year
two thousand the concept of temporary or recoverable filter
has emerged [1-3]. Therapeutic or prophylactic IVCF are placed
based on currently accepted indications to prevent PE [1-5]. The
number of IVCF implanted increased significantly, in the last
decades, despite the 2010 US Food and Drug Administration
Advisory “that effectiveness of IVCF insertion in reducing venous
thromboembolism (VTE)-associated morbidity and mortality
is uncertain ”. In other hand there is a wide variability in
the standards of practice between institutions and different
guidelines for the use of filters published by multiple societies [7-12]. IVCF implantations complications are common and include:
migration, fracture, recurrent VTE, infection and filter or cava thrombosis; they should be retrieved when duration of treatment
has been met, the risk of a PE is no longer high, or there is no
longer a contraindication to anticoagulation. An effective system
that leads to improving the retrieval rate of filters must include
a tracking system to minimize patient lost to follow-up, because
all recovery rates are of only 18-30% of the cases, low rates of
withdrawal of the implanted optional filters may represent a
flawed follow–up and propaedeutic protocols have not been
defined yet [8,10,12-14].
Despite all these considerations, a program of filter removal can
be proposed (Table 1 and Figure 1) [15,16]. CIRSE established a
registry of retrievable filter use with the primary aim of determining
the success of IVC Filter retrieval and associated complications
. The criteria in filters indications and accompanying patients
after implantation are essential to implement a filter removal
program. A multidisciplinary team-based including education, outpatient follow-up and initiation of the filter removal program
at the time of IVC filter placement significantly improved IVC
filter retrieval rates in a rural population . Authors agree that
to provide high-quality care in this patient population, these findings
support wide implementation of similar protocols [15,16].
|• Orientation to patient and family explaining: Type of filter implanted, date, indication and Service that performed the implant;
|• Term of consent;
|• Hematological follow-up;
|• Exclusion of patients with life expectancy less than 6 months;
|• IFU of the implanted device;
|• Noninvasive imaging: assessing migration, fractures, filter angulation, and cavity and filter patency;
|• AngioTC or MRI angiography in suspected cases of pit or filter thrombosis;
|• Venography for cases of doubt or endovascular treatment of complications;
|• They should be removed as early as possible.
Table 1: IVCF - Retrieval Program.
Figure 1: From left to right: Filter Retrieval, intervention
procedure material and embedded filter. Most of the
recoverable filters has own capture devices, composed
by high profile sheath, snares or 0.014 guidewires made
in the time of removal.
- Mahek Shah, Talal Alnabelsi, Shantanu Patil (2017) IVC filters—Trends in placement and indications, a study of 2 populations. Medicine 12: 6449.
- Crowther MA (2007) Inferior vena cava filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Am J Med 120: S13-S17.
- Duszak R, Parker L, Levin DC (2011) Placement and removal of inferior vena cava filters: National trends in the Medicare population. J Am Coll Radiol 8: 483-489.
- Spencer FA, Bates SM, Goldberg RJ (2010) A population- based study of inferior vena cava filters in patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 170: 1456-1462.
- Stein PD, Matta F, Hull RD (2011) Increasing use of vena cava filters for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 124: 655-661.
- Food and Drug Administration (2010) Removing Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: FDA Safety Communication.
- Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL (2011) Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123: 1788-1830.
- Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF, English WJ (2013) Risks and benefits of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hosp Med 8: 173-177.
- Haut ER, Garcia LJ, Shihab HM (2014) The effectiveness of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149: 194-202.
- Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ (2012) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141: e419S-494S.
- Baadh AS, Zikria JF, Rivoli S (2012) Indications for inferior vena cava filter placement: Do physicians comply with guidelines? J Vasc Interv Radiol 23: 989-995.
- Caplin DM, Nikolic B, Kalva SP (2011) Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22: 1499-1506.
- Jones RK, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC (2007) Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Retrievable Vena Cava filters in Trauma Patients: An AAST Multicenter Study. The J Trauma 62: 17-24.
- Mylankal KJ, Fitigde R (2018) Inferior vena cava filters: Recent Controversies. J Surg 88: 128-129.
- MJ Lee, D Valenti, MA Gregorio (2015) The CIRSE Retrievable IVC Filter Registry: Retrieval Success Rates in Practice. Cardiovas Int Radiol 38: 1502.
- Winters JP, Morris CS, Holmes CE, Lewis P, Bhave AD, et al. (2017) A multidisciplinary quality improvement program increases the inferior vena cava filter retrieval rate. Vas Med 1: 51-56.